File manager

File manager - Edit - /home/adiance/mail/.spam/new/1687254554.M842998P27135.40-69-163-212.cprapid.com,S=11409,W=11546

Back
Return-Path: <65783-786-103046-14696-nsaini=adiance.com@mail.littlecaesarssurvey.shop> Delivered-To: adiance+spam@40-69-163-212.cprapid.com Received: from 40-69-163-212.cprapid.com by 40-69-163-212.cprapid.com with LMTP id e8lWMRp2kWT/aQAAeDY3lg (envelope-from <65783-786-103046-14696-nsaini=adiance.com@mail.littlecaesarssurvey.shop>) for <adiance+spam@40-69-163-212.cprapid.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:49:14 +0000 Return-path: <65783-786-103046-14696-nsaini=adiance.com@mail.littlecaesarssurvey.shop> Envelope-to: nsaini@adiance.com Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:49:14 +0000 Received: from [198.211.43.204] (port=53727 helo=tommy.littlecaesarssurvey.shop) by 40-69-163-212.cprapid.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <65783-786-103046-14696-nsaini=adiance.com@mail.littlecaesarssurvey.shop>) id 1qBXz8-00072o-2A for nsaini@adiance.com; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:49:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=littlecaesarssurvey.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=CVSShopperFeedback@littlecaesarssurvey.shop; bh=GRwoWyIop+GwJ1Dufq+KytwSwvs=; b=i6Gno897A8msJphEbR6V5LvSu5pMDzt6zYvkC3uNQPcAczZrM1crK/ijEBDGh6gi82GUUxfoj/Zh YNehToo57lDsE6n7gFn38hn+ivDGCXP/Cz+CxiRG0ryBIwKoRLvY3oICpK94m/7ChQMiOITo8Yw4 8WzvDX3bjmwUvtQ4y/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=littlecaesarssurvey.shop; b=fblYkvglccX7imKaMNI7tAk0zQQzaAuSyPAi+tKAnRfyiFxzISFSH7gzl2BaEw6AIEyFoCOHURnR mVr8MJAIitkChTyeJ4W37Yt01h5lni+JVuXdGBDj7m73oxqBXeXocNeKmpe93sY3cfDhwqYERoNG eXtWkSlaRqTayodIk3o=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="debd7a027a9ea6808a13286354a5d864_312_19286" Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:36:59 +0200 From: "CVS Shopper Feedback" <CVSShopperFeedback@littlecaesarssurvey.shop> Reply-To: "Good News" <AmazingDeals@littlecaesarssurvey.shop> To: <nsaini@adiance.com> Message-ID: <95zg3zvjqxn56d9a-mgg0vlb0evu8lzcp-312-19286@littlecaesarssurvey.shop> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=15.6 X-Spam-Score: 156 X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "40-69-163-212.cprapid.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Grand prize WINNER Selected! http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/aVc5_8DKzm-io_bF9cZsY-SgU4LLE-MR1do_qN637aMXPLlZ http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/GHI_LMz_orHf9a0_haIWPQM6mW8a6iwLckDFDeQygc-iDKK7 Content analysis details: (15.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: littlecaesarssurvey.shop] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [198.211.43.204 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: littlecaesarssurvey.shop] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe X-Spam-Flag: YES Subject: *SPAM* Grand prize WINNER Selected! --debd7a027a9ea6808a13286354a5d864_312_19286 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Grand prize WINNER Selected! http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/aVc5_8DKzm-io_bF9cZsY-SgU4LLE-MR1do_qN637aMXPLlZ http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/GHI_LMz_orHf9a0_haIWPQM6mW8a6iwLckDFDeQygc-iDKK7 n 1964, a home leasehold ownership scheme was introduced but it was poorly received at first because most public housing residents were unable to afford the flats. Applicants could use their contributions from the Central Provident Fund (CPF), a compulsory savings scheme, to pay for their flats from 1968, and by 1984, 62 percent of flats were owned. The HDB started constructing its first new town in 1965; it was located about 5–8 km (3.1–5.0 mi) from the city centre, and had a town centre with amenities and industrial areas to provide employment to residents. From the late 1960s, the HDB began focusing on the quality of public housing, building larger flats and providing more amenities in housing estates. In addition, the 1966 Land Acquisition Act gave the government broad powers to take over land and made more land available for public housing. From the 1970s, public housing was constructed further away from the Central Area, more amenities were provided in new towns and flat sizes continued to increase. Owners were allowed to sell their flats on the resale market from 1971, and from the mid-1970s, the designs of public housing developments became more diverse. To provide flats for middle-class residents, who at the time could not afford to purchase housing built by private developers and were ineligible for flats built by the HDB, the Housing and Urban Development Company (HUDC) was set up in 1974. The HUDC's housing estates had layouts similar to those of private condominiums, and were initially well received. In addition, flats were built by the Jurong Town Corporation in Jurong and Sembawang between 1968 and 1982. In the late 1970s, in an attempt to build a sense of community within housing estates, Residents' Communities and the precinct concept were introduced. Rising construction costs during this period resulted in designs again becoming more uniform and from the early 1980s, housing construction started incorporating more prefabricated sections to reduce costs. The 1980s saw the introduction of larger executive flats while the HDB, which took over the HUDC in 1982, stopped construction of the middle class flats that had been constructed by the HUDC as the prices of these flats were approaching those of housing built by private developers, while the raising of income ceilings for the HDB's lower-end flats made the middle class eligible for these flats. In the light of falling --debd7a027a9ea6808a13286354a5d864_312_19286 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <title>Newsletter</title> </head> <body><a href="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/lUBsZkwZtR9PQfaZmLTU8XlE2noR8b67-AluassZrCePLRGH"><img src="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/70937d21918c684eda.jpg" /><img src="http://www.littlecaesarssurvey.shop/yJOd9FcwcVo4KBvnvadtrXNsBJKuN52igZmoQUpahKiQJfdD" /></a> <center>  <div style="max-width:100%;height:auto;"> <div style="font-size:25px;font-family:cambria;"><a href="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/aVc5_8DKzm-io_bF9cZsY-SgU4LLE-MR1do_qN637aMXPLlZ" style="color:#ee0000;"><b>Grand prize WINNER Selected!</b></a></div> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/aVc5_8DKzm-io_bF9cZsY-SgU4LLE-MR1do_qN637aMXPLlZ" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img src="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/32d4922bf5c1cabdab.png" style="border:2px solid #ee0000;" /></a><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />   <div style="font-size:12px; font-family:arial;">If you would like to unsubscibe,then <a href="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/tsv9qrk5ujU2zSrY_vNS49BXKtpBTkdPmQdXSyt35do0vLm5" style="font-weight:bold;">click here</a> or<br /> write to 126 E 23rd St New York, NY, US 10010</div>   <div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:8px;">n 1964, a home leasehold ownership scheme was introduced but it was poorly received at first because most public housing residents were unable to afford the flats. Applicants could use their contributions from the Central Provident Fund (CPF), a compulsory savings scheme, to pay for their flats from 1968, and by 1984, 62 percent of flats were owned. The HDB started constructing its first new town in 1965; it was located about 5–8 km (3.1–5.0 mi) from the city centre, and had a town centre with amenities and industrial areas to provide employment to residents. From the late 1960s, the HDB began focusing on the quality of public housing, building larger flats and providing more amenities in housing estates. In addition, the 1966 Land Acquisition Act gave the government broad powers to take over land and made more land available for public housing. From the 1970s, public housing was constructed further away from the Central Area, more amenities were provided in new towns and flat sizes continued to increase. Owners were allowed to sell their flats on the resale market from 1971, and from the mid-1970s, the designs of public housing developments became more diverse. To provide flats for middle-class residents, who at the time could not afford to purchase housing built by private developers and were ineligible for flats built by the HDB, the Housing and Urban Development Company (HUDC) was set up in 1974. The HUDC's housing estates had layouts similar to those of private condominiums, and were initially well received. In addition, flats were built by the Jurong Town Corporation in Jurong and Sembawang between 1968 and 1982. In the late 1970s, in an attempt to build a sense of community within housing estates, Residents' Communities and the precinct concept were introduced. Rising construction costs during this period resulted in designs again becoming more uniform and from the early 1980s, housing construction started incorporating more prefabricated sections to reduce costs. The 1980s saw the introduction of larger executive flats while the HDB, which took over the HUDC in 1982, stopped construction of the middle class flats that had been constructed by the HUDC as the prices of these flats were approaching those of housing built by private developers, while the raising of income ceilings for the HDB's lower-end flats made the middle class eligible for these flats. In the light of falling</div> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />   <div style="font-size:12px; font-family:arial;"><a href="http://littlecaesarssurvey.shop/GHI_LMz_orHf9a0_haIWPQM6mW8a6iwLckDFDeQygc-iDKK7" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">Click Here</a> to Unsubscribe write to<br /> 4128 Burnside Court Phoenix, AZ 85009</div> </div> </center> </body> </html> --debd7a027a9ea6808a13286354a5d864_312_19286--

| ver. 1.4 | Github | . | PHP 7.3.33 | Generation time: 0.07 | proxy | phpinfo | Settings