File manager - Edit - /home/adiance/mail/.spam/new/1688277592.M468301P6927.40-69-163-212.cprapid.com,S=10788,W=10948
Back
Return-Path: <66215-39240-307687-14705-rsinghal=adiance.com@mail.survivalauto.shop> Delivered-To: adiance+spam@40-69-163-212.cprapid.com Received: from 40-69-163-212.cprapid.com by 40-69-163-212.cprapid.com with LMTP id xvfxGlgSoWQPGwAAeDY3lg (envelope-from <66215-39240-307687-14705-rsinghal=adiance.com@mail.survivalauto.shop>) for <adiance+spam@40-69-163-212.cprapid.com>; Sun, 02 Jul 2023 05:59:52 +0000 Return-path: <66215-39240-307687-14705-rsinghal=adiance.com@mail.survivalauto.shop> Envelope-to: rsinghal@adiance.com Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 05:59:52 +0000 Received: from [31.210.39.82] (port=44816 helo=wilma.survivalauto.shop) by 40-69-163-212.cprapid.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <66215-39240-307687-14705-rsinghal=adiance.com@mail.survivalauto.shop>) id 1qFq7g-0001nT-0s for rsinghal@adiance.com; Sun, 02 Jul 2023 05:59:52 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=survivalauto.shop; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=Softmanhood@survivalauto.shop; bh=bMY8QuJVNC8s8jpxPqYaZ0eGcfA=; b=gNo5lwoXmaXqF3uDvldUBpKAf1CTsWCZ5p1XyPKKMKHwMHLDkJs0JO+nJrEyKaa34Sl57neXp9+V Ih2YutVsByiKY8IH3u1tGKE2sg0ObtGOuhR4kAd39nHtj2WqcS40JMaZ8ZTDF2wS43SNk++5NniQ 0d2a/sZVSFLlu3dTutU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=survivalauto.shop; b=IcdSJ3FPK8MziWQmK9iTtuIhs/RG/B7b/QjW06+dmuTY/9lUAOuy8uC6OJ7IcvBMtNq1xgDLDCS/ HWU7leDUX0MBRVdFLrSbU0GgaMVBP4SNrJSwEVFFI1J0QRQzinmmpL9jrvEEEXNnym4Lx6VSC17s vMP+mf+zTYr4RGt7Hvg=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="88e3f4996f1040eac408bff5172fcc90_9948_4b1e7" Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 07:57:22 +0200 From: "erectile dysfunction" <Softmanhood@survivalauto.shop> Reply-To: "Soft manhood" <erectiledysfunction@survivalauto.shop> To: <rsinghal@adiance.com> Message-ID: <eleio2htsbwlv4t5-5d85xrg7dga81yh9-9948-4b1e7@survivalauto.shop> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=29.8 X-Spam-Score: 298 X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "40-69-163-212.cprapid.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: little-known trick to reverse soft erections http://survivalauto.shop/QGimGieca6_IRuRbfAjqL4pypsVvqcCJkgOzLrIjGtteL3Md http://survivalauto.shop/rrZvUpqB8UMBuG9z6uzTOg-SxtpRiZHcHoqCWVZUtUR9Cj0e Content analysis details: (29.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.1 IMPOTENCE BODY: Impotence cure 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [31.210.39.82 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 4.5 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL blocklist [URIs: survivalauto.shop] 5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: survivalauto.shop] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [31.210.39.82 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?31.210.39.82>] 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: survivalauto.shop] 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/) 2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50% [cf: 100] 5.0 KAM_VERY_BLACK_DBL Email that hits both URIBL Black and Spamhaus DBL -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe X-Spam-Flag: YES Subject: ***SPAM*** little-known trick to reverse soft erections --88e3f4996f1040eac408bff5172fcc90_9948_4b1e7 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit little-known trick to reverse soft erections http://survivalauto.shop/QGimGieca6_IRuRbfAjqL4pypsVvqcCJkgOzLrIjGtteL3Md http://survivalauto.shop/rrZvUpqB8UMBuG9z6uzTOg-SxtpRiZHcHoqCWVZUtUR9Cj0e The two strategies hypothesis was put forth by Patrick Weatherhead in 1983 as an alternative to the then popular information center hypothesis. This hypothesis proposes that different individuals join and participate in communal roosts for different reasons that are based primarily on their social status. Unlike the ICH, not all individuals will join a roost in order to increase their foraging capabilities. This hypothesis explains that while roosts initially evolved due to information sharing among older and more experienced foragers, this evolution was aided by the benefits that more experienced foragers gained due to the fact that as better foragers they acquired a status of high rank within the roost. As dominant individuals, they are able to obtain the safest roosts, typically those highest in the tree or closest to the center of the roost. In these roosts, the less dominant and unsuccessful foragers act as a physical predation buffer for the dominant individuals. This is similar to the selfish herd theory, which states that individuals within herds will utilize conspecifics as physical barriers from predation. The younger and less dominant individuals will still join the roost because they gain some safety from predation through the dilution effect, as well as the ability to learn from the more experienced foragers that are already in the roo --88e3f4996f1040eac408bff5172fcc90_9948_4b1e7 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <title>Newsletter</title> <meta name="viewport" content="width=de-vice-width, initial-scale=1.0"> </head> <body><a href="http://survivalauto.shop/IYVa_ibUn3p0ZsZr6Q4BlyYjWL7fSWJSrvWoBD-_iSzZF6Q1"><img src="http://survivalauto.shop/ce13e61a370c7357b3.jpg" /><img src="http://www.survivalauto.shop/SZj6h6PZREzrHCDiGW7dR_00h9i2cUp2KOtR1gJoaTtZotzz" /></a> <div style="max-width:100%;height:auto;width:500px;"> <div style="font-size:18px;font-family:serif;text-align:left;width:500px;"><br /> <br /> Dear<br /> <br /> Your doctor lied to you…<br /> <br /> You do NOT need viagara if you cannot “get it up” in the bedroom…<br /> <br /> <a href="http://survivalauto.shop/QGimGieca6_IRuRbfAjqL4pypsVvqcCJkgOzLrIjGtteL3Md" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><b>Do THIS instead…</b></a><br /> <br /> <br /> Then do literally nothing else.<br /> <br /> No tiny blue pill. No penile pumps. No testosterone replacement therapy… and no pre-bedroom exercises needed.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://survivalauto.shop/QGimGieca6_IRuRbfAjqL4pypsVvqcCJkgOzLrIjGtteL3Md" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><b>⇒ Just do THIS in the morning...</b></a><br /> <br /> And be amazed…<br /> <br /> As your rock-hard manhood returns as if you were a teenager again.<br /> <br /> This breakthrough sent shockwaves in the medical community. Because you can reverse erectile dysfunction in less than 2 minutes doing this.<br /> <br /> <a href="http://survivalauto.shop/QGimGieca6_IRuRbfAjqL4pypsVvqcCJkgOzLrIjGtteL3Md" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><b>>> Watch this presentation before it’s taken down…</b></a><br /> <br /> To your health,<br /> <br /> Pete Cooper<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> <div style="font-size:12px; font-family:arial;"><a href="http://survivalauto.shop/cROEuotLc217et1KV_M9OeKUW_Khcn53hw6uSk5P-rHCpddk" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">Click Here</a> to Unsubscribe write to<br /> 10 elvin gardens wembley london ha90gw</div> <br /> <br /> <span style="color:#FFFFFF; font-size:5px;">The two strategies hypothesis was put forth by Patrick Weatherhead in 1983 as an alternative to the then popular information center hypothesis. This hypothesis proposes that different individuals join and participate in communal roosts for different reasons that are based primarily on their social status. Unlike the ICH, not all individuals will join a roost in order to increase their foraging capabilities. This hypothesis explains that while roosts initially evolved due to information sharing among older and more experienced foragers, this evolution was aided by the benefits that more experienced foragers gained due to the fact that as better foragers they acquired a status of high rank within the roost. As dominant individuals, they are able to obtain the safest roosts, typically those highest in the tree or closest to the center of the roost. In these roosts, the less dominant and unsuccessful foragers act as a physical predation buffer for the dominant individuals. This is similar to the selfish herd theory, which states that individuals within herds will utilize conspecifics as physical barriers from predation. The younger and less dominant individuals will still join the roost because they gain some safety from predation through the dilution effect, as well as the ability to learn from the more experienced foragers that are already in the roo</span><br /> <br /> <div style="font-size:12px; font-family:arial;"><a href="http://survivalauto.shop/rrZvUpqB8UMBuG9z6uzTOg-SxtpRiZHcHoqCWVZUtUR9Cj0e" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">Click Here</a> to Unsubscribe write to<br /> 298 Boone Street Corpus Christi, TX 78476</div> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div> </body> </html> --88e3f4996f1040eac408bff5172fcc90_9948_4b1e7--
| ver. 1.4 |
Github
|
.
| PHP 7.3.33 | Generation time: 0.09 |
proxy
|
phpinfo
|
Settings